With so much riding on your ability to improve outcomes and demonstrate return on investment (ROI), here are five important considerations to keep in mind when measuring training effectiveness.
Back to Articles
The comparison-to-standards approach is the most practical, scalable and cost-effective method to collect learning effectiveness data. Benchmarks establish a performance standard, which helps L&D professionals assess the quality of their training programs.
If the only audience for evaluation data are executives and L&D, you're missing your most important audience. The purpose of L&D is to create behavior change, and the learner’s manager has the greatest impact on whether learning is applied on the job.
The second quarter of 2019 saw significant activity in assessment and evaluation, compliance training, e-learning, IT and technical training, leadership training, learning technologies and human capital management (HCM) platforms, and sales enablement.
There are brilliant people creating assessments that can predict outcomes like job performance, turnover and leadership potential. You don’t have to go too deep into the science to use them appropriately and make better decisions about talent.
By using archetypes for analysis, you can group audiences and analyze your data at a deeper level to track and measure mindset shifts. This process requires going beyond the standard definitions of roles and tenure.
To be sure that everything is clear for the learners and that the program is effective, use some classroom assessment techniques during the training. With this approach, learners can receive the help they need while the training is fresh.