Let’s unpack and debunk the myth of using training ROI to measure training impact. There are numerous reasons why you should avoid applying this methodology.
Back to Articles
![ROI measurement]()
![learner feedback, collaborative learning, leadership,]()
![Building Measurement]()
![better development discussions,]()
![360 assessment, workforce analytics]()
![man looking at charts]()
![Measure Training Programs]()
![Data and the Hybrid Workplace]()
![Training Needs Analysis]()
![Data Management]()
Topic: Measurement and Analytics
Most Recent
By understanding which learner attitudes remained consistent over the years, and which were subject to surprising changes, L&D will be able to foster greater ROI and talent retention.
Measurement and impact reporting tells the business leaders and CEOs why they’re here in the first place.
Leaders should dedicate less of their one-on-one discussions with team members to short-term tasks and more to their long-term career aspirations within the company.
In the last few years, HR and learning and development (L&D) teams have used 360s to assess their organization’s developmental needs.
This white paper explains concepts and best practices for developing effective assessments and interpreting their results.
If your stakeholders cornered you and looked you in the eye and asked, “Why are we changing our training program this year?”, what would you say?
By bringing data to the forefront, organizations can make data-driven decisions about the future of their hybrid work model.
It’s time to reevaluate the training needs analysis!
Gathering metrics on the process, participation and outcomes of learning and development (L&D) programs is critical for helping employees grow. This data is valuable for measuring training effectiveness and business impact.